1. What are the
defining characteristics of the luxury goods industry? What is the industry
like?
There are some characteristics of the luxury goods industry
include creative designs, high quality, and brand reputation to attract
customers. The luxury goods market can divide to three categories:
haute-couture, traditional luxury, and accessible luxury. The haute-couture
offers extremely wealthy customers for high end “custom” products. Most
tradition luxury goods companies also diffusion their lines in the accessible
luxury. Luxury goods demand increase as the income increase. The luxury goods
market is driven by the economic and wealth status.
Due to the economic crisis in 2007-2009, the global luxury
goods market growth slowdown. Sales in US, Europe and Japan was declined during
the economic crisis. However, sales in emerging market including China and
India became a key growth driver for the luxury goods industry. It is
expectable to have 7.8 percent annual growth through 2015 to reach $350 billion
world sales. And, “Italian companies commanded 27 percent of industry sales,
while French companies held a 22 percent share, Swiss companies possessed a 19
percent share, and U.S. companies accounted for 14 percent of industry sales.”
2. What is
competition like in the luxury goods industry? What competitive forces seem to
have the greatest effect on industry attractiveness? What are the competitive
weapons that rivals are using to try to outmaneuver one another in the
marketplace? Is the pace of rivalry quickening and becoming more intense? Why
or why not?
To develop a new luxury goods brand in the market is
difficult and has strong competition. Most luxury goods brands on the market
have decades’ customer royalty, reputation image and their fashion styles.
These would be the strongest forces. Building customer relationship and public
reputation image in luxury goods market take several times of repurchasing
activities and service experience that isn’t easy for a new develop brand.
The power of bargaining with materials suppliers and
manufacturing units would also affect the final product’s competition. By using
flexible sourcing from different suppliers and manufactures that help Coach to
lower its costs and boost its profit margin.
The competitive weapons that rivals can use include: higher
materials and final product quality, fast response for the taste of the
customer desires products and precise advertisement for the products and brand
image. The competition becomes intense. The growing speed in emerging markets
is much faster than in the US, Europe and Japan market that intense the
competition.
3. How is the market
for luxury handbags and leather accessories changing? What are the underlying
drivers of change and how might those driving forces change the industry?
For the change of luxury handbags and leather accessories,
China had become the world third largest luxury market in 2010. As the income
growth in China, luxury accessory good demand growth. China and India markets
were expected to provide the major boost of luxury goods sales because of
wealth level rapidly growing. In 2012, there are 2.7 million millionaires and
63,500 individuals had net worth more than 15million in China. Because the great
growing demand of luxury that lead the luxury brand such as Chanel, Prada, and
Dolce & Gabbana expanding more stores in China. And also, counterfeit luxury
goods were estimated sold for 300-600 billion. According to Global congress on
combating counterfeiting, it estimated 9 percent of all goods sold worldwide
were counterfeit.
4. What key factors
determine the success of makers of fine ladies handbags and leather
accessories?
1.
High-quality products and manufacturing ability
to satisfy customer’s expectation.
2.
Create a fashionable and distinctive design styles
products
3.
A clear and cleaver eye-catching advertisement
4.
Designing an aesthetic attractiveness and
ambiance store
5.
The multiple retail distribution abilities
6.
The well trained customer service
5. What is Coach’s
strategy to compete in the ladies handbag and leather accessories industry? Has
the company’s competitive strategy yielded a sustainable
competitive advantage? If so, has that advantage translated into superior
financial and market performance?
Coach
was initially focused on introducing a new design of aesthetic attractiveness
stores and customer service training program that rebuild the customer
relationship. By using mass consumer survey, Coach was able to design more
consumer desire handbag such as edgier styling, softer leathers, and
leather-trimmed fabric handbags. Frankfort’s strategy of outsourcing its
production to 40 suppliers from 15 countries that gave Coach a huge ability to
lower its price beating rivals by 50 percent or more.
The
Coach strategy of distribution includes flagship, core retail store, department
store, and factory store. The flagship store carries the top price items newest
fashion products. The core store offers the most Coach items. Coach’s
department store provides the most popular handbags. The price oriented factory
stores were increasing about 9 percent between 2007 and 2011. There are about 75
percent of factory items produced specifically for factory store, and 25
percent of the item was overstocked from other stores. According to Coach CEO
Lew Frankfort, he believed 80 percent of women’s apparel was bought on sale or
in the discount stores. By increasing
factory stores to target value oriented customer that allow the company to
maintain profit margin from full price policy in full price stores.
Although
the US’s wholesale market become less relevant, the international wholesale
market have grown 7.8 percent per year to reach 230 million in 2007. Coach has
become more global oriented company and expects to yield good growth rate in
the following year.
6. What are the
strengths and weaknesses of Coach Inc.? What competencies and capabilities does
it have that its chief rivals don’t have? What new market opportunities does
Coach have? What threats do you see to the company’s future well being?
Strengths:
·
Product designing is based on market research
·
Contract with high-quality leather suppliers to
assure best material supply
·
Outsourcing production to low-cost countries
·
Monthly new products introducing
·
Strategic alliance to bring Coach brand to more
additional luxury categories such as watch, footwear, glasses.
·
Worldwide distribution channels
Weaknesses:
·
Factory stores outperformances its full price
stores
·
Coach men’s product area not enough
·
Coach does not open store in Europe
·
Outwear and other luxury categories accounts
very less percentage of the sale
Opportunities:
·
Rapid growing emerging market such as China and
India
·
Strategic alliance bringing more product
categories
·
Open up stores in Europe, Latin America, and
middle east
Threats:
·
As the increasing of factory store, the brand
name might be diluted.
·
European brands’ competition
·
Counterfeit goods market
7. What
recommendations would you make to Lew Frankfort to improve the company’s
competitive position in the industry and its financial and market performance?
1.
I would recommend Coach to re-examine each
store’s location, store’s type and sales performance. According to Coach retail
store increased record, the growth of factory store segment was high but it does
not reflect on its North America sales growth. By using geographic research
data, to decide the store type best fit to the location could boost store
performance.
2.
Coach should increase its expansion of stores in
emerging market. Entry to a mature luxury market like Europe market is
difficult, entering to an emerging market is compared easy. It is important for
luxury brand to grow customer loyalty when the market begins the demand of
luxury goods.
3.
Investment on market survey and designers for
different cultures.
4. Coach
should increase men’s products and men’s shopping area in the store. The image
of Coach is always the women’s luxury handbags brand that men do not want to
walk into the store. This strategy could change the image and increases men’s
product sales.
沒有留言:
張貼留言